直肠癌完全植入式中心静脉输液港血栓形成的危险因素分析

韦丽琴 ,  左红群 ,  蒙晶晶 ,  莫炎娥 ,  韦荣泉

巴楚医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 32 -37.

PDF (1352KB)
巴楚医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (2) : 32 -37. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-6113.2026.02.004

直肠癌完全植入式中心静脉输液港血栓形成的危险因素分析

作者信息 +

Analysis of Risk Factors for Thrombosis in Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1384K)

摘要

目的:探讨结直肠癌患者使用完全植入式中心静脉输液港(TIVAP)发生导管相关性血栓(CRT)的危险因素。方法:回顾性分析2020年1月—2023年8月于广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院胃肠外科行输液港植入的125例结直肠癌患者,根据颈部血管彩色多普勒超声检查结果分为血栓组(n=17)与非血栓组(n=108)。纳入单因素分析中有统计学意义的指标进行多因素Logistic回归分析及受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析。结果:125例结直肠癌TIVPA患者中17例发生CRT(13.60%)。单因素分析结果显示,血栓组的美国东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态评分、红细胞压积(HCT)及回肠造口比例均明显高于非血栓组(均P<0.05)。多因素Logistic分析进一步证实,ECOG评分升高(OR=2.678,95%CI:1.201,5.972)、HCT升高(OR=1.300,95%CI:1.121,1.506)和回肠造口(OR=4.082,95%CI:1.325,12.571)是CRT的独立危险因素。ROC曲线结果显示,ECOG评分升高、HCT升高和回肠造口曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.768、0.815和0.638,联合预测的AUC为0.892,灵敏度为88.24%,特异度为83.33%。结论:ECOG评分升高、回肠造口及HCT升高是结直肠癌患者行TIVAP发生CRT的独立危险因素。

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in colorectal cancer patients with totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAP). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 125 colorectal cancer patients who underwent TIVAP implantation in the department of gastrointestinal surgery at the Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital between January 2020 and August 2023. According to the results of color Doppler ultrasound examination of cervical vessels,patients were divided into the thrombosis group (n =17) and the non-thrombosis group (n =108). Indicators with statistical significance in univariate analysis were included in multivariate Logistic regression analysis and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Among the 125 colorectal cancer patients with TIVPA, 17 developed CRT (13.60%). Univariate analysis showed that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score, hematocrit (HCT), and proportion of ileostomy in the thrombosis group were significantly higher than those in the non-thrombosis group (all P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis further confirmed that elevated ECOG score(OR=2.678,95%CI:1.201,5.972), elevated HCT (OR =1.300,95%CI:1.121,1.506), and ileostomy(OR =4.082,95%CI:1.325,12.571)were independent risk factors for CRT. ROC curve results showed that the areas under the curve (AUC) for elevated ECOG score, elevated HCT, and ileostomy were 0.768, 0.815, and 0.638, respectively. The combined prediction AUC was 0.892, with a sensitivity of 88.24% and a specificity of 83.33%. Conclusion: Elevated ECOG score, ileostomy, and elevated HCT are independent risk factors for CRT in colorectal cancer patients undergoing TIVAP implantation.

关键词

结直肠癌 / 完全植入式中心静脉输液港 / 导管相关性血栓 / 回肠造口

Key words

colorectal cancer / totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) / catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) / ileostomy

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
韦丽琴,左红群,蒙晶晶,莫炎娥,韦荣泉. 直肠癌完全植入式中心静脉输液港血栓形成的危险因素分析[J]. 巴楚医学, 2026, 9(2): 32-37 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-6113.2026.02.004

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

郑荣寿, 张思维, 孙可欣, . 2016年中国恶性肿瘤流行情况分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2023, 45(3): 212-220.

[2]

Shi J F, Wang L, Ran J C, et al. Clinical characteristics, medical service utilization, and expenditure for colorectal cancer in China, 2005 to 2014: overall design and results from a multicenter retrospective epidemiologic survey[J]. Cancer, 2021, 127(11): 1880-1893.

[3]

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia 2019: cancer series no. 119, cat. no. CAN 123[R/OL]. Canberra: AIHW, 2019.[2025—10—15]. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer—in—australia—2019.

[4]

Wang F H, Zhang X T, Tang L, et al. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2023[J]. Cancer Commun (Lond), 2024, 44(1): 127-172.

[5]

中华医学会肿瘤学分会, 国家卫生健康委员会医政司. 中国结直肠癌诊疗规范(2023版)[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2023, 14(4): 706-733.

[6]

熊丽娇, 范新娟. 脑肿瘤术后患者植入输液港相关感染危险因素分析[J]. 巴楚医学, 2020, 3(4): 34-38.

[7]

Ye X H, Cui R H, Xu L, et al. Effects of totally implantable venous access ports on complications and quality of life in gastrointestinal cancer chemotherapy[J]. World J Gastrointest Surg, 2025, 17(8): 109333.

[8]

Jahanzeb M, Wu C Y, Lim H, et al. International experts consensus on optimal central vascular access device selection and management for patients with cancer[J]. J Vasc Access, 2025, 26(5): 1447-1458.

[9]

Werba A, Hennes R, Schuh F, et al. Prospective, monocentric observational study on the clinical use and patient satisfaction of an implantable venous access Port[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2025, 410(1): 84.

[10]

鲁佳, 谢开红, 陈文思, . 肿瘤患者输液港相关性血栓预防及管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(5): 544-551.

[11]

罗晗华. 经TIVAPS行新辅助化疗直肠癌患者导管外相关性血栓危险因素分析[D]. 昆明: 昆明医科大学, 2022.

[12]

王琼川. 直肠癌新辅助化疗患者静脉输液港导管外相关性血栓形成的初步临床观察[D]. 昆明: 昆明医科大学, 2021.

[13]

郭维英, 卢海雷, 欧顺玲. 直肠癌肝转移输液港植入患者导管相关性血栓影响因素分析[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2020, 26(21): 13-16.

[14]

温萌, 豆欣蔓, 苗晓琦, . 肿瘤患者完全植入式静脉输液港导管相关性血栓形成危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(23): 2825-2833.

[15]

Qiu L T, Li J J. Neoadjuvant therapy for organ preservation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a review[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2025, 21: 1289-1293.

[16]

Noiret B, Koo C H, Bacci M, et al. Clinical contexts for shared decision—making in rectal cancer: organ preservation, sphincter—sparing surgery and tailored stoma policy[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2025, 51(9): 110196.

[17]

薛雅婷, 安晓, 夏雨, . 基于循证理论构建肿瘤病人输液港相关性血栓风险预测模型[J]. 护理研究, 2023, 37(21): 3931-3936.

[18]

体能状态评分ECOG评分法[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2012(6): 556.

[19]

Takashima A, Hamaguchi T, Mizusawa J, et al. Oxaliplatin added to fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab as initial therapy for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer in older patients: a multicenter, randomized, open—label phase Ⅲ trial (JCOG1018)[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2024, 42(33): 3967-3976.

[20]

胡荣臻, 张莉, 刘慧革. 直肠癌肝转移输液港植入患者导管相关性血栓影响因素和营养干预措施研究[J]. 临床研究, 2023, 31(4): 151-154.

[21]

Nightingale J M D. How to manage a high—output stoma[J]. Frontline Gastroenterol, 2022, 13(2): 140-151.

[22]

Tilney H S, Sains P S, Lovegrove R E, et al. Comparison of outcomes following ileostomy versus colostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses[J]. World J Surg, 2007, 31(5): 1143-1152.

[23]

Bujko K, Nowacki M P, Oledzki J, et al. Sphincter preservation after short—term preoperative radiotherapy for low rectal cancerpresentation of own data and a literature review[J]. Acta Oncol, 2001, 40(5): 593-601.

[24]

Wyer N. Dietary management of patients with a high—output stoma[J] . Nurs Stand, 2022, 37(4): 71-76.

[25]

Rutegård M, Häggström J, Back E, et al. Defunctioning loop ileostomy in anterior resection for rectal cancer and subsequent renal failure: nationwide population—based study[J]. BJS Open, 2023, 7(3): zrad010.

[26]

Squeo G C, Parrish C R. High output ileostomies: preventing acute kidney injury[J]. Pract Gastroenterol, 2022, 2: 28-39.

[27]

Ota E, Watanabe J, Suwa H, et al. Preoperative risk factors for ileostomy—associated kidney injury in colorectal tumor surgery following ileostomy formation[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2024, 39(1): 160.

[28]

杨贵丽, 郑海燕, 毛燕, . 肺癌化疗病人输液港相关血栓形成的影响因素分析及护理对策[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2022, 47(9): 1272-1275.

[29]

段茂桂. 癌症患者完全植入性静脉输液港血栓形成因素分析[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2021, 18(8): 1137-1139.

[30]

缪敏, 瞿凯泉, 周娟, . 贝伐珠单抗对晚期结直肠癌血清D—二聚体和纤维蛋白原水平及动静脉血栓栓塞形成的影响[J]. 中国临床研究, 2023, 36(9): 1328-1332.

[31]

Brown A M, Nock S, Musgrave K, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as a biomarker for cancer—associated venous thrombosis: a meta—analysis[J]. TH Open, 2025, 9: a25134381.

基金资助

广西壮族自治区卫生厅健康委自筹科研项目(Z-A20230755)

广西壮族自治区卫生厅健康委自筹科研项目(Z-A20240711)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1352KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/