草海国家自然保护区景观生态风险与生态系统服务价值耦合协调研究

Coupling and coordination of landscape ecological risk and ecosystem service values in Caohai National Nature Reserve

摘要

基于草海国家自然保护区2005—2020年4期土地利用数据,利用ArcGis10.7、Fragstats4.2以及Geoda等探究景观生态风险与生态系统服务价值的时空演变趋势及相关性,进一步分析两者耦合协调特征。结合研究期内草海保护区相关政策探讨其对草海生态格局的影响,提出“核心区-缓冲区”分区管理的生态治理路径,以期为草海保护区未来的发展和规划提供参考。研究发现:1)2005—2020年草海国家自然保护区景观生态风险呈现“中间低四周高”的空间分布格局,较高及高生态风险占比呈先增后减的倒“V”型变化规律。2)草海湿地对草海国家自然保护区生态系统服务价值贡献最大,超过总价值的70%,且2005—2020年呈先减少后增加的趋势,净增加0.112亿元。3)2005—2020年草海国家自然保护区景观生态风险与生态系统服务价值呈显著负相关性;低风险-高价值类型为主要空间集聚模式。4)草海国家自然保护区景观生态风险与生态系统服务价值耦合协调水平良好,协调区域主要集中在草海国家自然保护区核心区、缓冲区。

Abstract

This study utilizes four-phase land ues data from Caohai National Nature Reserve during 2005 to 2020,and uses software such as ArcGis10.7,Fragstats4.2,and Geoda to explore the spatio-temporal evolution trends and correlation between landscape ecological risk and ecosystem service values,further analyze their coupling and coordination characteristics.Combined with the relevant policies of Caohai Reserve during the study period,it discusses the impacts on the ecological pattern of Caohai,and proposes an ecological governance paths of “core area-buffer zone” zoning management,aiming to provide references for the future development and planning of Caohai Nature Reserve.The findings show that:1) From 2005 to 2020,the landscape ecological risks in Caohai National Nature Reserve showed a spatial distribution pattern of "low in the middle and high around the periphery".The proportion of higher and ecological risk presented an inverted "V" shaped change rule of first increasing and then decreasing.2) The Caohai wetland contributed the most to the ecosystem service values of Caohai National Nature Reserve,accounting for more than 70% of the total values.From 2005 to 2020,it showed a trend of first decreasing and then increasing,with a net increase of 11.2 million yuan.3) From 2005 to 2020,the landscape ecological risk and ecosystem service values in Caohai National Nature Reserve showed a significant negative correlation; the low-risk and high-values type was the main spatial agglomeration pattern.4) The coupling and coordination level between landscape ecological risk and ecosystem service values in Caohai National Nature Reserve is good,and the coordinated areas are mainly concentrated in the core area and buffer zone of Caohai Reserve.

关键词

草海国家自然保护区 / 景观生态风险 / 生态系统服务价值 / 耦合协调度

Key words

Caohai National Nature Reserve / landscape ecological risk / values of ecosystem services / coupling coordination

[1] 黄宝荣,马永欢,黄凯,等.推动以国家公园为主体的自然保护地体系改革的思考[J].中国科学院院刊,2018,33 (12):1342-1351.
[2] 李辉,周启刚,李斌,等.近30年三峡库区生态系统服务价值与生态风险时空变化及相关性研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2021,30(3):654-666.
[3] 傅伯杰,张立伟.土地利用变化与生态系统服务:概念、方法与进展[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(4):441-446.
[4] 康鹏,陈卫平,王美娥.基于生态系统服务的生态风险评价研究进展[J].生态学报,2016,36(5):1192-1203.
[5] 靳甜甜,张云霞,朱月华,等.黄土高原林区生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险时空变化及其关联性:以子午岭区为例[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(5):1623-1632.
[6] 王玲,汪淼.成渝城市群景观生态风险演变分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2023,32(3):626-637.
[7] 曹祺文,张曦文,马洪坤,等.景观生态风险研究进展及基于生态系统服务的评价框架:ESRISK[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):843-855.
[8] 王舒,刘凤莲,陈威廷,等.滇中高原湖泊流域景观生态风险评价及驱动因素识别[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2024,32(3):391-404.
[9] 张振明,刘俊国.生态系统服务价值研究进展[J].环境科学学报,2011,31(9):1835-1842.
[10] Costanza R,D'arge R,De Groot R,et al.The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387(6630):253-260.
[11] Costanza R.Ecosystem health and ecological engineering[J].Ecological Engineering,2012,45(8):24-29.
[12] 彭建,党威雄,刘焱序,等.景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望[J].地理学报,2015,70(4):664-677.
[13] 郑嘉鑫,裴小龙,宋东阳,等.时空动态视角下基于ESV与ERI的生态分区识别:以河北省秦皇岛市为例[J].自然资源遥感,2025,37(3):233-244.
[14] 梁仕豪,李文,高宇,等.吉林省生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险关联性及其空间分异[J].应用生态学报,2024,35(3):769-779.
[15] 陆乃静,杨光,张天琪,等.托克托县生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险时空变化及其关联性[J].西北林学院学报,2023,38(4):286-294.
[16] 张静,秦公伟,成升魁,等.汉江生态经济带景观生态风险与生态系统服务价值的时空变化及关联性[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(4):294-306.
[17] 王丽娜,杨国福,李嘉欣,等.湿地生态系统服务与景观生态风险时空演变及关联性:以杭嘉湖平原为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2024,33(9):2043-2058.
[18] 李俊翰,高明秀.滨州市生态系统服务价值与生态风险时空演变及其关联性[J].生态学报,2019,39(21):7815-7828.
[19] 孟祥源,王子昊,王冰,等.呼包鄂生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险时空动态变化及关联性[J].环境科学,2025,46(9):5941-5950.
[20] Zhang Yali,Hu Xijun,Wei Baojing,et al.Spatiotemporal exploration of ecosystem service value,landscape ecological risk,and their interactive relationship in Hunan Province,Central-South China,over the past 30 years[J].Ecological Indicators,2023,156,111066.
[21] 陈峰,李红波,张安录.基于生态系统服务的中国陆地生态风险评价[J].地理学报,2019,74(3):432-445.
[22] 徐梦菲,汪霞.基于生态系统服务价值的郑洛沿黄地区景观生态风险时空演变及驱动力分析[J].环境科学,2026,47(1):444-455.
[23] 杨晓芳,于少康,罗志军,等.多尺度视角下环鄱阳湖区景观生态风险与生态系统服务的相互关系及分区管控[J].环境科学,2025,46(12):7918-7934.
[24] 乔斌,曹晓云,孙玮婕,等.基于生态系统服务价值和景观生态风险的生态分区识别与优化策略:以祁连山国家公园青海片区为例[J].生态学报,2023,43(3):986-1004.
[25] Wang Siqi,Chen Yuyang,Jin Hanyu,et al.Ecological management zoning based on the causation between ecological risk and ecosystem services in the Gaoligong Mountain[J].Ecological Indicators,2024,167:112673.
[26] 谭洁,廖朝阳,余德,等.LUCC影响下洞庭湖区生态系统服务价值与景观生态风险耦合特征研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2025,34(10):2338-2351.
[27] 杨靖,段禾祥,宋福强,等.2000—2020年高黎贡山景观生态风险时空演变分析[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2024,44(4):54-63.
[28] Jiao Mengyu,Wang Yafei,Hu Mengmeng,et al.Spatial deconstruction and differentiation analysis of early warning for ecological security in the Pearl River Delta,China[J].Sustainable Cities and Society,2021,64:102557.
[29] 陈心怡,谢跟踪,张金萍.海口市海岸带近30年土地利用变化的景观生态风险评价[J].生态学报,2021,41(3):975-986.
[30] 邹永偲,兰安军,范泽孟,等.“三生空间”视角下贵州省景观生态安全评价及其耦合特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(3):432-442.
[31] 张学斌,石培基,罗君,等.基于景观格局的干旱内陆河流域生态风险分析:以石羊河流域为例[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(3):410-419.
[32] 于婧,汤昪,陈艳红,等.山水资源型城市景观生态风险评价及生态安全格局构建:以张家界市为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(4):1290-1299.
[33] 邹珮雯,徐昉.生态安全格局构建及景观生态风险预测:以赛罕乌拉国家级自然保护区为例[J].生态学报,2023,43(23):9981-9993.
[34] 娄妮,王志杰,何嵩涛.基于景观格局的阿哈湖国家湿地公园景观生态风险评价[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(1):233-239.
[35] Liu Heng,Tang Diwei.Ecological zoning and ecosystem management based on landscape ecological risk and ecosystem services:a case study in the Wuling Mountain Area[J].Ecological Indicators,2024,166:112421.
[36] 谢高地,张彩霞,张雷明,等.基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1243-1254.
[37] 戚琦,王玲,陈俊辰,等.武汉市城市快速扩张与生态系统服务价值权衡/协同的交互作用[J].地理科学,2024,44(6):953-963.
[38] 谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
[39] 沈杨,汪晗,聂鑫.基于景观生态风险和生态系统服务价值的海岸带地区生态修复分区研究:以防城港市为例[J].环境工程技术学报,2024,14(3):1066-1076.
[40] 冯婧文,丁雪,易邦进.基于GEE的昆明市生态系统服务价值与生态风险变化[J].水土保持通报,2024,44(1):335-345.
[41] 李晨璐,谢文芳,王倩,等.商洛市生态系统服务与人类福祉耦合关系的时空演变[J].生态学杂志,2024,43(9):2694-2701.
[42] Chen Bo,Zhang Meiqi,Yang Rui,et al.Spatiotemporal variations in the carbon sequestration capacity of plateau lake wetlands regulated by land use control under policy guidance[J].Land,2023,12(9):1695.

基金资助

贵州省高校人文社会科学研究项目资助(2025RW77)