杏树间作薄荷/紫苏对小气候、产量及经济效益的影响

赵伊桐, 张文文, 李国钰, 申磊, 李哲, 尉雯雯, 周润, 周雅, 张伟

石河子大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5) : 612 -622.

PDF (9245KB)
石河子大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5) : 612 -622. DOI: 10.13880/j.cnki.65-1174/n.2026.23.018
农业·林业

杏树间作薄荷/紫苏对小气候、产量及经济效益的影响

    赵伊桐1, 张文文1, 李国钰1, 申磊1, 李哲1, 尉雯雯1, 周润2, 周雅2, 张伟1*
作者信息 +

Effects of intercropping mint/perilla on microclimate, yield and economic benefits of apricot trees

    ZHAO Yitong1, ZHANG Wenwen1, LI Guoyu1, SHEN Lei1, LI Zhe1, WEI Wenwen1, ZHOU Run2, ZHOU Ya2, ZHANG Wei1*
Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (9465K)

摘要

本研究以杏树薄荷、杏树紫苏系统为研究对象,通过田间试验探究其对小气候、作物生长、产量及经济效益的影响,为新疆地区杏药复合种植模式的推广提供理论依据。结果表明,与单作相比,间作下空气温度降低3.90%~8.90%,空气相对湿度提高10.14%~15.13%,平均风速降低42.68%~56.10%。间作显著促进了薄荷与紫苏的株高、茎粗及相对叶绿素含量(SPAD值)的增长,但叶面积有所减小。杏树产量在单作与间作模式下无显著差异,而间作模式下薄荷与紫苏的产量显著下降。2种间作系统的土地当量比(LER)均大于1,表明其土地综合利用率优于单作,其中杏树紫苏模式表现出更高的经济效益。综上,杏树薄荷、杏树紫苏模式是兼顾生态调节与经济效益的种植模式,杏树紫苏模式更适合在新疆地区杏园推广应用。

Abstract

In this study, the apricot-mint and apricot-perilla intercropping system was used as the research object, and their effects on microclimate, crop growth, yield and economic benefits were explored through field experiments, which provided a theoretical basis for the promotion of apricot-medicinal compound planting mode in Xinjiang. The results show that compared with monoculture, intercropping temperature by 3.90%~8.90%, relative air humidity by 10.14%~15.13%, and average wind speed by 42.68%~56.10%. Intercropping significantly promots the growth of plant height, stem diameter and relative chlorophyll content (SPAD) of mint and perilla, but reduces their leaf area. There is no significant difference in apricot yield between monoculture and intercropping patterns, while the yield of mint and perilla decreases significantly in intercropping patterns. The land equivalent ratio (LER) of the two intercropping systems is greater than 1, indicating that the comprehensive land use efficiency is better than that of monoculture, and the apricot-perilla model shows higher economic benefits. In summary, both the apricot mint and apricot-perilla models are planting models that balance ecological regulation and economic benefits. The apricot-perilla model is more suitable for promotion and application in apricot orchards in Xinjiang.

关键词

杏药间作 / 田间小气候 / 农艺性状 / 产量 / 经济效益

Key words

apricot medicine intercropping / field microclimate / agronomic traits / production / economic benefit

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
赵伊桐, 张文文, 李国钰, 申磊, 李哲, 尉雯雯, 周润, 周雅, 张伟. 杏树间作薄荷/紫苏对小气候、产量及经济效益的影响[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 44(5): 612-622 DOI:10.13880/j.cnki.65-1174/n.2026.23.018

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1] 苏浩,张锐澎,吴思炫,等. 连作障碍产生机理及防控现状[J]. 土壤, 2024, 56(2): 242-254.
Su Hao, Zhang Ruipeng, Wu Sixuan, et al. Mechanisms of continuous cropping obstacles and current situation of prevention and control[J]. Soils, 2024, 56(2): 242-254.
[2] 郭兰萍,王铁霖,杨婉珍,等. 生态农业——中药农业的必由之路[J]. 中国中药杂志. 2017, 42(2): 231-238.
Guo Lanping, Wang Tielin, Yang Wanzhen, et al. Ecological agriculture: Future of agriculture for Chinese material Medica[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2017, 42(2): 231-238.
[3] Mahajan S, Thakur P, Das S, et al. Impression of contemporary heat stress complexities in agricultural crops: A review[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2025, 105(6): 1805-1823.
[4] Agnolucci P, Rapti C, Alexander P, et al. Impacts of rising temperatures and farm management practices on global yields of 18 crops[J]. Nature Food, 2020, 1(9): 562-571.
[5] Hébert È M, Martin-Guay M O, Maheu A, et al. Microclimate, soil moisture and forage yield vary spatially within a temperate tree-based intercropping system: From competition to facilitation[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2025, 319: 109782.
[6] Montoya S G, Motoike S Y, Kuki K N, et al. Viability of a macauba palm-Brachiaria grass intercropping system as an alternative to agroforestry production[J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2021, 41(4): 55.
[7] 赵忠晶. 新疆三个杏品种在主产区的植物学特征与采收指标的研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2021.
[8] 白振华. 关于新疆杏产业发展的思考[J]. 新疆农业科技, 2024, 46(1): 19-20.
Bai Zhenhua. Thoughts on the development of apricot industry in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 46(1): 19-20.
[9] 崔宽波,朱占江,杨莉玲,等. 新疆杏采后贮藏保鲜研究现状及展望[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2022, 48(2): 280-286.
Cui Kuanbo, Zhu Zhanjiang, Yang Liling, et al. Research on status and prospects of Xinjiang apricot storage[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(2): 280-286.
[10] 文定梅,张洪彪,秦凤园,等. 林下环境因子对药用植物林下种植的影响[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2025, 50(5): 1164-1171.
Wen Dingmei, Zhang Hongbiao, Qin Fengyuan, et al. Effects of understory environmental factors on understory planting of medicinal plants[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2025, 50(5): 1164-1171.
[11] 杨春鹏. 冀北山区果药间作技术[J]. 果树实用技术与信息, 2021(10): 23-25.
Yang Chunpeng. Intercropping techniques of fruit and medicine in mountainous areas of northern Hebei Province[J]. Fruit Tree Practical Technology and Information, 2021(10): 23-25.
[12] 俞浩,辛华夏,陈浩,等. 薄荷挥发油成分的气相色谱-质谱联用分析及抗衰老作用[J]. 中药新药与临床药理,2021, 32(1): 73-78.
Yu Hao, Xin Huaxia, Chen Hao, et al. Gc-ms analysis of mentha haplocalyx oil and its anti-aging effects[J]. Traditional Chinese Drug Research and Clinical Pharmacology, 2021, 32(1): 73-78.
[13] 孙江怡. 新疆紫苏叶花色苷的提取、生物活性及其在酸奶中的应用[D]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2023.
[14] 程建明,薛峰,张云羽,等. 药食同源产品研发现状、技术关键与对策[J]. 南京中医药大学学报, 2023, 39(9): 814-826.
Cheng Jianming, Xue Feng, Zhang Yunyu, et al. Research and development status, technical keys and countermeasures of medicinal and food homologous products[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2023, 39(9): 814-826.
[15] 王红阳,康传志,张文晋,等. 中药生态农业发展的土地利用策略[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2020, 45(9): 1990-1995.
Wang Hongyang, Kang Chuanzhi, Zhang Wenjin, et al. Land use strategy of ecological agriculture of Chinese materia Medica in future development[J]. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, 2020, 45(9): 1990-1995.
[16] Ashraf M, Sanusi R, Zulkifli R, et al. Alley-cropping system increases vegetation heterogeneity and moderates extreme microclimates in oil palm plantations[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019, 276: 107632.
[17] 石然启,王晗生,邓文凯,等. 南疆平原区枣园树形与生草对小气候的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(4): 1127-1134.
Shi Ranqi, Wang Hansheng, Deng Wenkai, et al. Effects of different tree forms and grass mulching on microclimate in Ziziphus jujuba orchards in the plain regions of southern Xinjiang, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(4): 1127-1134.
[18] Ntshidi Z, Dzikiti S, Mazvimavi D, et al. Contribution of understorey vegetation to evapotranspiration partitioning in apple orchards under Mediterranean climatic conditions in South Africa[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 245: 106627.
[19] Tanaka K, Hashimoto S. Plant canopy effects on soil thermal and hydrological properties and soil respiration[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2006, 196(1-2): 32-44.
[20] Starck I, Aalto J, Hancock S, et al. Slow recovery of microclimate temperature buffering capacity after clear-cuts in boreal forests[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2025, 363: 110434.
[21] 艾鹏睿,马英杰. 间作模式农田小气候效应对棉花生理生态指标的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(9): 1594-1602.
Ai Pengrui, Ma Yingjie. Effects of field microclimate on physiological and ecological indexes of cotton under intercropping mode[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(9): 1594-1602.
[22] 黄天忠,曹国璠,赵明书,等. 不同种植模式对油茶林地小气候和土壤养分含量的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2019, 50(11): 2512-2518.
Huang Tianzhong, Cao Guofan, Zhao Mingshu, et al. Effects of different planting patterns on microclimate indicators and soil nutrient contents in Camellia oleifera forest[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2019, 50(11): 2512-2518.
[23] 曹琦,毛廷勇,汪志强,等. 塔里木盆地西北缘不同种植模式棉田微环境及经济效益比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2921-2931.
Cao Qi, Mao Tingyong, Wang Zhiqiang, et al. Comparison of microenvironment and economic benefits of cotton fields with different planting patterns in northwest margin of Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 2921-2931.
[24] Sawan Z M. Climatic variables: Evaporation, sunshine, relative humidity, soil and air temperature and its adverse effects on cotton production[J]. Information Processing in Agriculture, 2018, 5(1): 134-148.
[25] Ding Y K, Feng Y Q, Chen K, et al. Analysis of spatial and temporal changes in vegetation cover and its drivers in the Aksu River Basin, China[J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1): 10165.
[26] Wang J H, Yin M H, Duan Y Y, et al. Enhancing water and soil resources utilization via wolfberry-alfalfa intercropping[J]. Plants, 2024, 13(17): 2374.
[27] Jiang N, Cheng H, Liu C C, et al. A wind tunnel study of the effects of vegetation structural characteristics on the airflow field[J]. Catena, 2024, 242: 108064.
[28] 刘柱,孟维伟,林松明,等. 作物对间作遮荫胁迫的响应机制及缓解措施研究进展[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2026, 48(1): 42-53.
Liu Zhu, Meng Weiwei, Lin Songming, et al. Research progress on response mechanism to intercropping shading stress and its mitigation measures in crops[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2026, 48(1): 42-53.
[29] Han R, Ma L, Terzaghi W, et al. Molecular mechanisms underlying coordinated responses of plants to shade and environmental stresses[J]. The Plant Journal, 2024, 117(6): 1893-1913.
[30] Ding S Q, Hao Y, Tian H J, et al. Response of stalk lodging resistance traits, yield and quality of silage maize to high density[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15: 30110.
[31] Uyehara I K, Bechinger T, Jordan A, et al. Neighbour-detection causes shifts in allocation across multiple organs to prepare plants for light competition[J]. Functional Ecology, 2024, 38(8): 1848-1858.
[32] 阿布都克尤木·阿不都热孜克,高强,徐麟,等. 遮荫对橡胶草生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(11): 2126-2134.
Abudoukeyoumu Abudourezike, Gao Qiang, Xu Lin, et al. Effects of shading on the physiological characteristics of Taraxacum kok-saghyz Rodin[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(11): 2126-2134.
[33] Gu Y R, Ibitoye R G, He J J, et al. Photosynthetic performance and yield of intercropped maize and soybean are directly opposite under different intercropping ratios and maize planting densities interactions[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2025, 105(13): 7440-7452.
[34] Kishore K, Rupa T R, Samant D. Influence of shade intensity on growth, biomass allocation, yield and quality of pineapple in mango-based intercropping system[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2021, 278: 109868.
[35] Zhang S, Liu T T, Wei W W, et al. In arid regions, the different intercropping systems reduce interspecific competition to improve system productivity[J]. Plant and Soil, 2025, 506(1): 137-155.
[36] 郭小琰,雷京奇,刘灵娣,等. 林下6种药用植物的耐阴性比较[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2023, 51(4): 182-184,188.
Guo Xiaoyan, Lei Jingqi, Liu Lingdi, et al. Comparison of shade tolerance of six medicinal plants under forest[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(4): 182-184,188.
[37] 张莉,张艳玲,刘红云,等. 茅苍术林下种植模式对土壤养分及其根茎品质的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(8): 2117-2123.
Zhang Li, Zhang Yanling, Liu Hongyun, et al. Effects of forest-medicinal plants intercropping patterns on soil nutrient contents and rhizome quality of Atractylodes lancea(Thunb.)DC[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2021, 52(8): 2117-2123.
[38] Tripathi P, Shah S, Kashyap S D, et al. Fruit yield and quality characteristics of high density Prunus persica (L.) Batsch plantation intercropped with medicinal and aromatic plants in the Indian Western Himalayas[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2019, 93(5): 1717-1728.

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(32260723)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (9245KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉