数字经济对农村能源贫困的影响研究

卞雪珂 ,  蔡林美

资源与产业 ›› 2026, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5) : 84 -96.

PDF (1210KB)
资源与产业 ›› 2026, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5) : 84 -96. DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20260727.001
非主题来稿选登

数字经济对农村能源贫困的影响研究

作者信息 +

The Impacts of Digital Economy on Rural Energy Poverty

Author information +
文章历史 +
PDF (1238K)

摘要

破解农村能源贫困是推进乡村全面振兴、落实“双碳”发展战略、实现人与自然和谐共生的关键任务。当前我国农村仍面临能源可及性不足、用能成本偏高、基础设施滞后等结构性难题,而数字经济作为驱动要素配置重构、赋能传统产业升级的关键力量,为破解农村能源贫困提供了新路径。基于2014—2023年我国30个省(市、区)面板数据,采用熵值法分别构建数字经济发展综合指数与农村能源贫困多维指数,运用双向固定效应模型,实证检验数字经济对农村能源贫困的影响效应,并通过多重稳健性检验验证结论可靠性。进一步构建中介效应模型,识别数字经济缓解农村能源贫困的传导路径。最后采用Hansen面板门槛回归模型,结合Bootstrap自抽样法,检验数字经济影响农村能源贫困的非线性门槛特征,并开展区域异质性分析,探究不同发展条件下数字经济能源减贫效应的差异化规律。研究结果表明,数字经济对农村能源贫困具有显著的缓解作用,且该结论经过多重稳健性检验后依然成立。机制检验表明,数字经济主要通过2条路径发挥减贫效能:1)推动产业结构升级,创造更多就业岗位与增收机会,增强农村居民能源消费支付能力;2)赋能农村能源基础设施水平提升,优化能源供给结构与配置效率,改善农村用能条件。异质性分析结果表明,数字经济的减贫效应具有显著的区域差异,整体呈现“西部最强、中部次之、东部不显著”的特征,且在经济欠发达地区的作用更为突出。门槛效应检验表明,数字经济对农村能源贫困的缓解作用存在单一门槛特征,当数字经济发展水平跨越门槛临界值后,其缓解效应显著增强。基于上述研究结论,提出以下政策建议:加快农村数字基础设施建设,补齐中西部地区数字短板,夯实能源数字化转型基础;推动数字经济与农村产业深度融合,以产业升级带动居民增收,从根源上缓解能源贫困;实施差异化数字赋能策略,重点支持欠发达地区数字经济发展,充分释放数字减贫红利;健全农村能源数字化服务体系,推动能源基础设施智能化升级,实现能源减贫与“双碳”目标协同推进。

Abstract

Alleviating rural energy poverty is critical to rural revitalization, the “dual carbon” strategy, and human-nature harmony. Rural China still faces insufficient energy access, high energy costs, and lagging infrastructure. As a key force reshaping factor allocation and upgrading traditional industries, the digital economy offers a new path. Using panel data from 30 provincial-level regions in China from 2014 to 2023, this study constructs a digital economy development index and a multidimensional rural energy poverty index via the entropy weight method. It uses a two-way fixed effects model to test the impact, a mediation model to identify transmission paths, and a Hansen panel threshold model with Bootstrap to examine nonlinear threshold effects and regional heterogeneity. Results show that digital economy significantly alleviates rural energy poverty, and this conclusion remains robust after multiple checks. Mechanistically, it reduces energy poverty by promoting industrial upgrading, creating jobs and income, and by improving rural energy infrastructure and supply efficiency. The effect is strongest in the west, weaker in the center, and insignificant in the east, and is more pronounced in less developed areas. It also has a single-threshold feature. Once digital economy development crosses the threshold, its alleviating effect strengthens markedly. Policy recommendations include accelerating rural digital infrastructure, closing digital gaps in central and western regions, deepening integration between the digital economy and rural industries to raise incomes, adopting differentiated digital empowerment strategies for underdeveloped areas, and improving digital energy services and intelligent infrastructure to coordinate energy poverty reduction with the “dual carbon” goals.

关键词

数字经济 / 农村能源贫困 / 产业结构升级 / 农村能源基础设施 / 门槛效应

Key words

digital economy / rural energy poverty / industrial structure upgrading / rural energy infrastructure / threshold-effect

引用本文

引用格式 ▾
卞雪珂,蔡林美. 数字经济对农村能源贫困的影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2026, 28(5): 84-96 DOI:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20260727.001

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

参考文献

[1]

何可, 朱信凯, 李凡略, 2023. 聚“碳”成“能”: 碳交易政策如何缓解农村能源贫困?[J]. 管理世界, 39(12): 122-144.

[2]

〔He Ke, Zhu Xinkai, Li Fanlüe, 2023. Accumulating carbon to form “energy”: How can carbon trading policy alleviate rural energy poverty?[J]. Journal of Management World, 39(12): 122-144.〕

[3]

江艇, 2022. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济(5): 100-120.

[4]

〔Jiang Ting, 2022. Mediating effects and moderating effects in causal inference[J]. China Industrial Economics(5): 100-120.〕

[5]

刘南, 孔军, 师婉睿, 2025. 中国农村能源市场一体化与能源贫困研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 39(9): 13-26.

[6]

〔Liu Nan, Kong Jun, Shi Wanrui, 2025. Energy market integration and energy poverty in rural China[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 39(9): 13-26.〕

[7]

刘勇政, 徐贻帆, 邓怀聪, 2025. 减税政策的区域异质性投资效应[J]. 经济研究, 60(5): 107-123.

[8]

〔Liu Yongzheng, Xu Yifan, Deng Huaicong, 2025. Regional heterogeneity in investment effect of tax cut policy[J]. Economic Research Journal, 60(5): 107-123.〕

[9]

刘自敏, 邓明艳, 朱朋虎, 等, 2022. 个人碳交易机制可以改善家庭能源贫困吗?: 兼论我国个人碳交易市场的核心参数设计[J]. 统计研究, 39(3): 117-131.

[10]

〔Liu Zimin, Deng Mingyan, Zhu Penghu, et al., 2022. Can PCT scheme reduce household energy poverty?: The core parameter design of China's PCT[J]. Statistical Research, 39(3): 117-131.〕

[11]

玛依努尔, 马继越, 2025. 数字经济与产业结构升级: 理论逻辑与实证检验[J]. 资源与产业, 27(1): 22-34.

[12]

〔Maynur,Ma Jiyue, 2025. Digital economy and industrial structural upgrading: Theoretical logic and empirical test[J]. Resources & Industries, 27(1): 22-34.〕

[13]

潘为华, 贺正楚, 潘红玉, 2021. 中国数字经济发展的时空演化和分布动态[J]. 中国软科学(10): 137-147.

[14]

〔Pan Weihua, He Zhengchu, Pan Hongyu, 2021. Research on spatiotemporal evolution and distribution dynamics of digital economy development in China[J]. China Soft Science(10): 137-147.〕

[15]

唐松林, 段亚琪, 周文兵, 2025. 发展分布式光伏有助于缓解农村家庭能源贫困吗?[J]. 数量经济研究, 16(2): 47-66.

[16]

〔Tang Songlin, Duan Yaqi, Zhou Wenbing, 2025. Will the distributed photovoltaics help alleviate rural household energy poverty?[J]. The Journal of Quantitative Economics, 16(2): 47-66.〕

[17]

唐子微, 2024. 数字经济对中国能源贫困的影响研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学.

[18]

〔Tang Ziwei, 2024. The impact of digital economy on energy poverty in China[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University.〕

[19]

王军, 朱杰, 罗茜, 2021. 中国数字经济发展水平及演变测度[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 38(7): 26-42.

[20]

〔Wang Jun, Zhu Jie, Luo Qian, 2021. Research on the measurement of China's digital economy development and the characteristics[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 38(7): 26-42.〕

[21]

徐敏, 姜勇, 2015. 中国产业结构升级能缩小城乡消费差距吗?[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 32(3): 3-21.

[22]

〔Xu Min, Jiang Yong, 2015. Can the China's industrial structure upgrading narrow the gap between urban and rural consumption?[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 32(3): 3-21.〕

[23]

张锦, 王政, 2022. 城镇化对农村能源贫困影响的实证研究: 基于城乡相对贫困视角[J]. 生态经济, 38(11): 108-114.

[24]

〔Zhang Jin, Wang Zheng, 2022. Empirical study of effects of urbanization on rural energy poverty: From the perspective of urban-rural relative poverty[J]. Ecological Economy, 38(11): 108-114.〕

[25]

赵子微, 胡蕴赟, 2025. 实施以人为本的新型城镇化战略能否缓解家庭能源贫困[J]. 广东财经大学学报, 40(1): 93-111.

[26]

〔Zhao Ziwei, Hu Yunyun, 2025. Can a people-centered new urbanization strategy alleviate household energy poverty[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, 40(1): 93-111.〕

[27]

Banerjee R, Mishra V, Maruta A A, 2021. Energy poverty, health and education outcomes: Evidence from the developing world[J]. Energy Economics, 101: 105447.

[28]

Bhutto A W, Karim S, 2007. Energy-poverty alleviation in Pakistan through use of indigenous energy resources[J]. Energy for Sustainable Development, 11(1): 58-67.

[29]

Carfora A, Scandurra G, 2024. Forecasting energy poverty in European countries: The effect of increasing energy commodities prices[J]. Energies, 17(5): 1224.

[30]

Dino G E, Catrini P, Buscemi A, et al., 2023. Modeling of a bidirectional substation in a district heating network: Validation, dynamic analysis, and application to a solar prosumer[J]. Energy, 284: 128621.

[31]

Luan Bingjiang, Zou Hong, Huang Junbing, 2023. Digital divide and household energy poverty in China[J]. Energy Economics, 119: 106543.

[32]

Ma Wanglin, Zheng Hongyun, Gong Binlei, 2022. Rural income growth, ethnic differences, and household cooking fuel choice: Evidence from China[J]. Energy Economics, 107: 105851.

基金资助

陕西省哲学社会科学重大理论与现实问题重点智库研究项目(2021ZD0998)

碳达峰、碳中和政策体系研究(2021D1001)

陕西省人大财经委高质量发展专题调研课题研究项目(2022HZ1541)

延安大学2025年研究生科研创新计划项目(YKY2025058)

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (1210KB)

0

访问

0

被引

详细

导航
相关文章

AI思维导图

/

〈 〉